Writing is a very powerful thing. People from all ages, races, and cultures have used writing as a form of expression for centuries. Some works of writing can influence or change certain aspects of life. Those who read these works are sometimes so heavily inspired that they take matters into their own hands and carry out the visions of the writer. There are particular writers that are always quoted and never forgotten. We have to remember that there are thousands of writers from past times as well as our times that create powerful writings as well.
One writer whose writings had the power to enact social change is Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. His speeches and writings have been some of the most influential and inspiring documents of all time. His writings changed social class and economic issues. They also started the Civil Rights Movement, which has opened many doors for people. The writings of King have been so powerful that his messages seep through the lines in other writers of today. There are three poets in particular that have developed their own perspective on the writings of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
The first poet that illustrates a message of King’s writings is Terry Tempest Williams. The three line poem reads,
The erosion of voice is the build-up of war.
Silence no longer supports prayers,
But lives inside the open mouths of the dead.
(February 12, 2003).
This poem is compared with a passage from King’s “I See the Promised Land”. In his passage he talks about how the nation is sick, troubled, and in a state of confusion. He expresses his desire for God to let him live a few years in the second-half of the twentieth century so that his voice can be the cause of the ‘masses of people who will be rising up’. Both writings demonstrate how one person’s voice can impact a society and how a prayer won’t support you unless there is some individual’s action behind it. These two writings influence people to use their voices to stand up for what they believe in. Many people today have been so inspired that they have accomplished great goals by using their voice alone.
On April 7, 1957 King gave a sermon at Dexter Avenue Baptist Church called “The Birth of a New Nation”. In it, he reminds his fellow Americans that they can ‘break loose from oppression without violence’ and that they ‘must revolt in such a way that after the revolt is over (they) can live with people as their brothers and sisters’. Gregory Orr is the second writer whose poem “Refusing” demonstrates this nonviolent resistance ideal of Kings’. Orr uses the following metaphor to express his message,
Tough bargaining,but easy on the violence.
That's what we poets learned from poems: it's all on the table,
but it's stupid to break up the table with an axe,
to splinter the chairs.
When he says that ‘it’s stupid to break up the table with an axe to splinter the chairs’ he is saying the same thing as King. They both agree that there are limitless ways to revolt that don’t include violence. Today many people use this message by using forms of protest, sit-ins, boycotts, and civil disobedience to resist instead of turning towards violence.
The final poet, Rose Styron, talks about the death of children in the midst of violence. Dr. King also talks about this in his “Eulogy for the Martyred Children”, Sept. 18, 1963, Birmingham Ala. Styron writes,
What shall we sing on the crest of a war all sense we ride wrong
save the mad boy in power deaf to the cries deep in cities and forests
tuned only to praise from his patriot chorus?
What anthems or lullabies soon can restore us
after we killed the children?
(Untitiled, March 2003)
King expresses his compassion for children when he writes ‘they are martyred heroines of a holy crusade for freedom and human dignity.’ These two writers express their humble attitudes towards children who are affected by wars/violence. Today there are thousands of services provided to protect and aid children. There are also many people who have devoted their lives to making sure that the children of our world are safe and provided for.
All in all, I believe that writings can enact social change. If someone doesn’t agree, then I believe that they are reading the wrong type of writings. In today’s society people have very malleable minds and when they retain information from writings, they feel as if it is their responsibility to take action. I think that more people should tell their opinions and ideas on life so that we can all communicate and help one another out in the beautiful form of expression we know as writing.
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Gabrielle, this is wonderfully conceived, thoughtful, and so well written. You seem to have a real passion for this kind of writing and literary analysis. You've made a compelling argument for the power that language and writing have to enact change. Keep up the good work!
ReplyDelete